Who is Credible?

As of today Michael Ignaieff is on the record as he was in 2007 as stated that he is categorically ruling out a hidden agenda of forming a coalition with the NDP and BQ… http://www.suite101.com/content/michael-ignatieff-says-no-to-coalition-a147762 “Michael Ignatieff is saying no to a coalition. In recent comments made at a press conference the liberal leader ruled out the idea of a power-sharing agreement. The idea is based on one first introduced last November under former Liberal Leader Stephane Dion. The federal Liberals under Dion voted no confidence in Stephen Harper’s Conservative government and proposed to replace it with a coalition government led by Dion as Prime Minister. The proposal would have seen the coalition supported by the New Democratic Party (NDP), who would have a few members in cabinet positions, and the Bloc Québécois, who wouldn’t formally take positions within cabinet, but agree to support them for a period of 18 months. It failed when Harper suspended Parliament. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Ignatieff/ "When the Liberals reached an accord with the other opposition parties to form a coalition and defeat the government, Ignatieff reluctantly endorsed it. He was reportedly uncomfortable with a coalition with the NDP and outside support from the Bloc Québécois, and has been described as one of the last Liberals to sign on." There is a hell of a difference when the word coalition means the possibility of forming a government with the winning party of the day, and that of forming a coalition with sworn enemies to the constitution and well being of the nation of Canada He lied in 2008… Why would he believe him now???

More Cheek Than We Can Bear

What would make “Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition” party so irrational as to incur the wrath of the Canadian electorate in the ensuing “Seinfeld Election” in Canadian politics? The word “Unholy Alliance” or “Collation” come to mind in an unsettling, but crystallizing way… Meanwhile generation liberals across Canada, amongst themselves ponder the burning question…can a fledgling campaigner such as Michael Ignatieff avoid falling on his own sword during the next six weeks, after the rookie gaffe of evading reporters very same questions today? Will Canadians festering anger reach the boiling point of no return first, when they examine whether the $400,000,000.00 spent on this needless charade, would not have benefited seniors in a more meaningful way if this weeks budget had been supported, instead of trashed out of hand by opposition parties? You, the voting Canadian electorate must impart a poignant but potent message to those who serve their own selfish interest, before that of Canada's honest, toiling citizens.